[LTER-im] integration of markdown with TextType (and other proposed changes) in EML 2.2==> unit-related tickets

[Eda C. Melendez-Colom]

Hi,
Thank you Earl for this update.
I was looking the list of tickets and saw at list two related to units that are not in the Unit dictionary.
Does that mean that new units will be incorporated into the Unit Registry which I understand is our official unit list?
Who maintains this registry?
EDA


Eda C. Melendez Colom
 Information Manager
 LTER Program
 University of Puerto Rico
 Tel. (787) 764-0000 (1-88225)
 Fax (787) 772 -1481 

    On Monday, February 12, 2018, 6:31:55 PM AST, Stevan Earl <stevan.earl at asu.edu> wrote:  
 
 Hello IMs,

I think you are all aware that Matt Jones and others are preparing for a release of EML 2.2. One of the issues that I have been following closely is this one related to the implementation of TextType in EML as I have found the DocBook implementation/limitations in EML extremely frustrating. At the risk of butchering the technical details, I am super, super, super (yes, three supers!) excited about a change that Matt and others have proposed for EML 2.2 that would allow for the integration of markdown (sorry, Margaret) with TextType. Matt would love feedback from the community on this proposed change, so, if you are interested in this issue, please express your thoughts in the afore linked GitHub issue.

Related, please see here for a list of the many tickets that Matt and others are working on related to EML 2.2.


Thanks for your consideration,
Stevan


-- 
Stevan Earl
Information Manager, Central Arizona–Phoenix LTER
Data Manager
 
 P.O. Box 875402 | Tempe, Arizona | 85287-5402
PH: 480-965-1851 | Main: 480-965-2975_______________________________________________
Long Term Ecological Research Network
im mailing list
im at lternet.edu

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lternet.edu/pipermail/im/attachments/20180217/e70ad7dc/attachment.html>