[LTER-im] Removing from PASTA?

Jonathan Walsh walshjcaryinstitute at gmail.com
Sun Feb 28 11:17:20 MST 2016


Thanks for all the help and information!

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Walsh <
walshjcaryinstitute at gmail.com> wrote:

> James makes a good point that I forgot to consider.  Those stream
> temperature DOIs are already a part of the public domain and may well have
> been used and cited so it's silly to consider deleting them.
>
> It would be nice if we could control what PASTA lists for the search
> results so that deprecated data sets would still be available but not show
> up as a first choice for the simple search.  And then maybe in advanced
> search there could be a toggle to display deprecated datasets.  My goal is
> to keep our premiere datasets, which are more and more multi dataset
> packages, from being buried by our older, not-as-useful datasets to someone
> browsing our data.
>
> I like the idea of including provenance EML for each of the deprecated
> packages in my new multi dataset packages to provide a path forward and
> backward between the old and new.  I would definitely like to do that.  I'm
> also working on a multi dataset package for our telephone survey GIS
> componentry and it's a similar situation.
>
> A strategy to help ensure no new copies of deprecated packages get
> released into the wild would indeed be a good topic for a call.
>
> Thanks for a
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 4:52 PM, James Laundre <jlaundre at mbl.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> I have emailed Mark and Jame Brunt about deleting files from the LTER
>> Network Data Portal since we are combining some of our yearly files into
>> multiyear files. The email from James is below. I have just started the
>> process of deprecating the old data sets and have not yet look into
>> including the provenance EML.
>>
>> One suggestion I have is to put a note in the abstract of the deprecated
>> data set that explains and points to the new multiyear data set.  The
>> abstract most likely will be read by people.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> *From: *"James Brunt" <jbrunt at lternet.edu>
>> *To: *jlaundre at mbl.edu
>> *Cc: *"Mark Servilla" <servilla at LTERnet.edu>
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 13, 2015 4:14:01 PM
>> *Subject: *deleting data sets
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Jim -
>>
>> Mark forwarded me your request regarding deleting data packages. If I
>> understand correctly what you are doing is creating new data packages
>> that cover a series of years that you want to replace the individual
>> annual data packages.
>>
>> The individual packages that have already been published are basically
>> in the public domain having been registered with DataCite and received
>> a DOI, and been contributed to DataONE and from there possibly beyond.
>> These data packages have potentially been used and cited in journals
>> and we have an obligation to make sure the original is still available.
>>
>> We can however make sure that no new copies of the deprecated data
>> packages get released into the wild. This might require a call to
>> discuss further but basically the process would be to update all of
>> the impacted data packages with a revison that closes public read
>> access in the EML to make them private. I'm assuming that you would
>> issue new ID numbers. (If you were planning to update say the first
>> ID number in each series this would still work to deprecate all the
>> other data package IDs.)
>>
>> If you wanted to make a slightly cleaner and more elegant transition
>> you could include the provenance EML for each of the deprecated
>> packages in your new package EML. That way there is a path forward and
>> backward between the old and the new.
>>
>> I'm sure this probably isn't what you want to hear since you were
>> probably hoping to create a more compact list of ARC data packages.
>> There were a number of finer grained tweaks to control the display
>> like this that we had hoped to implement that had to be abandoned when
>> NSF cut our funding.
>>
>> All that said, it is still technically possible to delete a data
>> package from PASTA but it's only through the API and wouldn't have any
>> effect on those records already in DataONE and the wild. The Scope and
>> Identifier are marked as deleted and cannot subsequently be reused. We
>> would discourage this for the reason of our public obligation stated
>> above and have only used it under extreme circumstances.
>>
>> I'm happy to continue this discussion to fine tune your strategy as
>> you feel necessary.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Linda A Powell" <powell at fiu.edu>
>> *To: *"Jonathan Walsh" <walshjcaryinstitute at gmail.com>, "IM committee" <
>> im at lternet.edu>
>> *Sent: *Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:02:36 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [LTER-im] Removing from PASTA?
>>
>>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>
>> A short while ago the entire IM community with the exception of Suzanne
>> (via doodle poll) wanted to have all the old metacat (PASTA) records (that
>> we thought were deleted) removed from being seen in DataOne.  Suzanne
>> agreed with this practice but can't have her files deleted yet as they are
>> still transferring files into PASTA.  Mark was going to write a script for
>> DataOne that would hide/remove these old files from the DataOne users and I
>> don't know where he is in the process but hopefully it will be finished
>> soon.
>>
>>
>> I've not deleted a file in PASTA yet so I don't know how well the process
>> works.  I suspect that the old, removed, files might not show up in PASTA
>> but may be pushed to DataOne.  Hopefully Mark can speak to this.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Linda
>>
>>
>> Linda Powell
>> Information Manager
>> Florida Coastal Everglades LTER Program
>> OE 148, Florida International University
>> University Park
>> Miami, Florida 33199
>> Phone (Tallahassee, FL): 850-745-0381
>> Phone(Miami,FL): 305-856-0039 or  305-348-6054
>> Website: http://fcelter.fiu.edu
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* im <im-bounces at lists.lternet.edu> on behalf of Jonathan Walsh <
>> walshjcaryinstitute at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:05 PM
>> *To:* IM committee
>> *Subject:* [LTER-im] Removing from PASTA?
>>
>> I think this topic has come up in the past but I do not recall the
>> outcome and if so I apologize for that.
>>
>> How can I remove records from PASTA?  I have a whole bunch of stream
>> temperature files that I would like to combine.  Then I would like to
>> remove the old ones.
>>
>> The reason for this is when one browses BES on PASTA one sees mostly
>> stream temperature files and it's confusing.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Information Manager, Baltimore Ecosystem Study
>> Institute of Ecosystem Studies
>> Box AB; Route 44A
>> Millbrook, NY 12545-0129
>> P: 845/677/7600 Extension 103
>> F: 845/677/5976
>> E: WalshJ at EcoStudies.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Long Term Ecological Research Network
>> im mailing list
>> im at lternet.edu
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Information Manager, Baltimore Ecosystem Study
> Institute of Ecosystem Studies
> Box AB; Route 44A
> Millbrook, NY 12545-0129
> P: 845/677/7600 Extension 103
> F: 845/677/5976
> E: WalshJ at EcoStudies.org
>



-- 
Information Manager, Baltimore Ecosystem Study
Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Box AB; Route 44A
Millbrook, NY 12545-0129
P: 845/677/7600 Extension 103
F: 845/677/5976
E: WalshJ at EcoStudies.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lternet.edu/pipermail/im/attachments/20160228/528af923/attachment.html>


More information about the im mailing list